Top Stories

NS dodger jailed for 11/2 months

EVASION: Brian Joseph Chow, who is training to be a commercial pilot, had evaded enlistment for more than six years. He had studied overseas.


    Feb 12, 2016

    NS dodger jailed for 11/2 months

    A 25-YEAR-OLD man with attention deficit disorder who left the country as a teenager to study in Australia and evaded enlistment for more than six years was yesterday jailed for 1½ months.

    The sentence was handed down to Brian Joseph Chow after the prosecution appealed to the High Court against his original sentence of a $4,500 fine.

    Justice Chan Seng Onn told Chow that he would have been jailed three months if not for his outstanding performance during his national service (NS), which he eventually served when he voluntarily returned to Singapore in May 2013.

    Chow, who is training to be a commercial pilot, asked through his lawyer, S. H. Almenoar, to defer his prison term but the request was rejected and he started serving the sentence immediately.

    Chow first left to study in Australia in 2005, when he was 15. His parents had decided to enrol him at Murdoch College in Perth, which had a programme to help him manage his condition.

    In January 2008, he was notified to register for NS. After a letter from the school, the Ministry of Defence offered him a deferment for his foundation course - but not for his tertiary studies. Follow-up reporting orders were issued.

    In March 2009, Chow applied via e-mail to defer NS for his university studies. This was rejected. Two months later, he made the same plea and was again rejected.

    He returned to Singapore two months after he graduated from the University of Western Australia.

    Last October, Second Solicitor-General Kwek Mean Luck had appealed for Chow to be jailed, urging the court to build on a landmark ruling in 2014 that those who default on NS for more than two years should be jailed.

    Yesterday, Justice Chan also pointed out that Chow's attention deficit disorder "was a red herring".

    "While it might have been the case that the appellant had left Singapore because he felt that the local education system did not cater to his condition, this had nothing to do with his culpability," he said.

    "The appellant's culpability flowed not from the fact that he left for Australia because of his attention deficit disorder, but from him remaining there even after he knew that he was required to register for a valid exit permit or return for NS."