Top Stories

First to plead guilty, he gets jail, cane

REMORSEFUL: Ramalingam, seen here on the night of the riot, intends to serve his sentence and does not plan to appeal.
First to plead guilty, he gets jail, cane

NIGHT OF MAYHEM: During the Dec 8 riot, the mob overturned police patrol cars and set an ambulance on fire.


    May 09, 2014

    First to plead guilty, he gets jail, cane

    THE first man who pleaded guilty to rioting during the unrest that broke out in Little India in December last year was sentenced yesterday to 21/2 years in jail and three strokes of the cane.

    Ramalingam Sakthivel, an Indian national, was also given a jail term of two years and three months for causing mischief by fire.

    The two sentences will run concurrently, but they were backdated to Dec 8 - the night of his arrest, when Singapore saw its first riot in more than 40 years.

    The 33-year-old had met friends in Little India earlier that day and later consumed a bottle of brandy, the court heard. He was walking towards Race Course Road with the intention of taking a chartered bus back to his dormitory when he saw the mob.

    He then joined in and pelted police officers and vehicles with projectiles, and smashed the windscreen of a police vehicle with a wooden pole.

    The construction worker also helped to flip a police car and attacked an ambulance with a pole while Home Team officers were taking cover in the Singapore Civil Defence Force vehicle.

    Earlier, the court was shown video evidence of Ramalingam attempting to set a private bus at the scene on fire. The prosecution estimated that his actions caused damage amounting to more than $370,000.

    Deputy Presiding Judge Jennifer Marie had harsh words for Ramalingam during sentencing, saying: "The accused was no meek follower - he rallied others to join him and pursued a course of conduct that showed him to be unfazed by the risk to his own life and limb."

    She added that he had displayed "open hostility" towards law enforcement officers.

    "The audacious acts of violence by the accused reflected his contempt for authority, and law and order," she noted.

    She said that even though she had taken into account mitigating factors raised by the defence, including Ramalingam's clean record in the five years he had worked here, his actions could not be considered in isolation.

    "The point of a rioting charge of this nature is that the accused is held accountable for the acts of all involved," she said.

    "Each individual who takes an active part by deed or encouragement is guilty of the collective offence of rioting."

    Moreover, she said, a deterrent sentence was necessary to send a general message to potential offenders that punishment "will not only be certain, but unrelenting".

    Ramalingam's lawyer, Justin Tan from Trident Law, said his client does not plan to appeal. "Our client is remorseful and is going to serve his term."

    Six other men, mostly Indian nationals, have served sentences for other charges related to the riot. Some 18 others have cases against them pending in court.