How Auschwitz is misunderstood

THE LAST ONE: Auschwitz death camp survivor Eva Fahidi, 90, with a picture of her family, who were all killed in the concentration camp during World War II. As existentially troubling as Auschwitz was and is, it was technically unnecessary for the commission of the Holocaust.


    Jan 26, 2015

    How Auschwitz is misunderstood

    AUSCHWITZ was liberated 70 years ago, on Jan 27, 1945, and news of its existence shocked the world.

    With its principal killing centre at one of its main camps, Auschwitz-Birkenau, becoming fully operational in 1942, it was Germany's largest and most notorious extermination site.

    There, the Germans slaughtered approximately 1.1 million people, 1 million of whom were Jews. Its mention evokes notions of evil and instant horror. Auschwitz was a death factory, an oxymoron that would have made no sense before the Holocaust, but is now effortlessly comprehensible.

    But Auschwitz is also misunderstood - and that misunderstanding distorts what we think about the Holocaust, and about the Nazis themselves.

    Historical and popular accounts of the Holocaust tend to emphasise its brutal, bureaucratic efficiency, with Auschwitz as its technological pinnacle, whose industrial scale was not only emblematic of, but also necessary for, its success.

    But as existentially troubling as Auschwitz was and is, and as lethally portentous as it would have been had Nazi Germany won World War II, it was technically unnecessary for the commission of the Holocaust.

    Had the Nazis never created gassing installations at Auschwitz, Treblinka, Sobibor and elsewhere, they would still have killed around the same number of Jews and non-Jews.

    About half of the roughly six million Jews whom the Germans and their European collaborators slaughtered, and virtually all the millions of non-Jews the Germans murdered, they killed by non-industrial means, mainly by shooting or starving them to death.

    The cliche "assembly line killing" belies the fact that rounding up Jews and shipping them, sometimes for many hundreds of kilometres, to a death factory was far less efficient than merely killing them where the Germans found them.

    The Nazi leadership created death factories not for expeditious reasons, but to distance the killers from their victims.

    Previous and subsequent genocidal assaults also belie the once reflexively intoned notion that modern technology made the Holocaust possible.


    Regimes and their executioners around the globe have conducted broad eliminationist assaults against targeted peoples, with the perpetrators using a variety of means, including mass murder, expulsion, forced conversion and the prevention of reproduction to rid themselves of hated or unwanted groups.

    In Rwanda in 1994, the Hutu perpetrators killed 800,000 Tutsi at a more intensive daily rate than the Germans did the Jews, using only the most primitive technological means, mainly machetes, knives and clubs.

    Focusing on Auschwitz's mechanistic qualities as a precondition for the Holocaust's vast destructiveness allows people to see the Nazis' eliminationism as something uniquely modern - to believe that it takes a technically proficient, bureaucratically expert state to carry out such violence.

    Even though we all recognise that genocides can be unleashed without such advanced systems, people still too often assume that true eliminationism, with the intention of completely destroying another group, takes a relatively rare constellation of a state apparatus and technological means. But that's not true.

    To understand the politics of mass murder and eliminationism, the technical means of carrying out the deed are almost never the central issue.

    Rather, the crucial elements are the political leaders' decision to commit genocide, the willing participation of a large population of perpetrators, the sympathy of an even broader civilian population - in the case of the Holocaust, principally ordinary Germans, but also many other Europeans - and, above all, the ideology that motivates them all to believe that annihilating the targeted people is necessary and right.

    This, rather than its technical specifications, is why Auschwitz is so important. Auschwitz is a symbol of the broader, and little understood, racist revolution that the Germans were bringing about in Europe that sought to overturn the fundamentals of Western civilisation, including its core notion of a common humanity.


    The gassing installations that became Auschwitz's emblem were but one part of Auschwitz's system of more than 40 camps and sub-camps. These were run by thousands of German overlords who drove and brutalised hundreds of thousands of Jews, Russians and other "sub-humans", whom they used as slaves to work under horrifying conditions in the camps' extensive and varied production facilities, making everything from agricultural products to chemicals and armaments.

    Auschwitz was thus much more than just the gas chambers and crematoriums - taken as a whole, it was a microcosm, not so much of the specific mechanisms of the Holocaust, but of the Nazis' ideological vision of a world to be ruled by a master race, resting on the collective graves of the Jewish people and of tens of millions of additional victims the Germans deemed demographically expendable, and served by an enormous population of slaves.

    It reveals that during the Holocaust, mass annihilation, as genocide always is, was part of a larger eliminationist agenda and, at its core, a mechanism for social and political transformation.

    This commonality notwithstanding, Auschwitz still had its singular quality: It expressed the Nazis' unparalleled vision that denied a common humanity everywhere, and global intent to eliminate or subjugate all non-members of the "master race". Heinrich Himmler, the head of the Schutzstaffel and the man most responsible for putting the Germans' plans in action, proudly announced in an address in 1943: "Whether nations live in prosperity or starve to death interests me only insofar as we need them as slaves for our culture."

    Such was the Nazis' moral and mental mutation, the most profound in the history of Europe, that Auschwitz was built upon, and that, better than any other place, it symbolises.

    When Europe's leaders assemble at Auschwitz tomorrow for the 70th anniversary commemoration, they should remember and mourn the Jewish and non-Jewish victims. They should also realise that they are gazing into the abyss that would have consumed their continent and the world.